I want to get focused into this subject because I consider that this is the part which is more difficult to get, and it is the reason why many people are stuck, even myself, without building the whole device. This is for me the part that is stopping people from building this device. Therefore here I want to make a summary of the different possibilities that I may envision. If someone has any other idea please send it.
We have to differentiate between the 1902 patent, no. 30378, and the 1908 patent no. 44267:
- In the 1902 patent Figuera stated that it just required one single signal “intermittent or alternating current” to excite the machine.
- In the 1908 patent Figuera described the use of two opposite signals (unphased 180º) to excite the electromagnets.
This is a huge difference and I still do not know if the second patent is just an upgrade or optimization of the initial design or they are just two different machines. Or that in 1902 Figuera did not disclosed all the details, but he did it in 1908, few days before dying. Who knows…
1902 Patent (no. 30378)
In this patent Figuera stated that it was needed an intermitent or alternating current to excite all the electromagnets. In order to create an “intermittent or alternating current” [It is curious to note that Figuera used the word “alternating current”, not the word “alternate current”, something weird… ] there are many options:
- A rotational mechanical device to pulse the current
- A relay to pulse the current
- A VFD (Variable Frequency Drive) to pulse the current
- Any other electronic circuit design as a PWM (Pulse Width Modulation)
- For the case of alternating current maybe the AC from the mains or a rectified AC current with a diode bridge
Figuera offered very few details in his 1902 patents. He did not defined the type of intermittent current or whether it should get to zero voltage or not. That´s why I prefer the 1908 patent because there are more details and supposedly it is and optimization over the original design. Maybe an optimization or maybe just an adjustment to create AC in the output that was getting world spread in those days instead of a pulsed putput from the 1902 patent which needed to be accumulated in a battery before its use. Who knows…
It is my belief that Figuera in the 1902 patent may have used some kind of coil interconnections to get a different filter in each coil taking profit of the internal filtering of the inductance and resistance of each coil to unphase his one input signal and create, perhaps, two partially unphased signals in each set of confronted electromagnets. The more coils that are transversed the greater the filter : filter constant = (L1+L2+…+Ln)/(R1+R2+….Rn) . You may see what I mean reading the section B in the chapter below.
1908 Patent (no. 44367)
In this case Figuera defined the use of two opposite signals: when one was at maximum the other was at minimum, when one was increasing the other was decreasing.
Figuera solved this situation with the use of a mechanical commutator based on many intermediate contacts varying the resistance to each set of coils in order to split the current to one or the other set. The problem with the mechanical commutator is that it is very difficult to build it, especially for amateur people. there some options to get those two opposite signals:
A) Develop a mechanical commutator as that described in the patent
Some possible designs for the commutator could include the use of a commutator extracted for an old motor, some brushes and slip rings
Other design to assure a robust contact while spinning will require to have all the brushes static:
Or other possible design:
A simulation of the actual commutator described by Figuera can be seen in this Excel File. Take into account that Figuera represented a simplified commutator design to “make easy the understanding” as he literally wrote. I guess he could have used one commutator and two resistors arrays in parallel to get symmetrical signal to each set of coils.
B) Two unphased square signals feeding the coils
If you feed two square signals (in opposition) created with two coupled transistors (in opposition: when one is ON the other is OFF and the contrary) those signals once that reach each set of coils suffer a filter ( filter with time constant = L/R , as consequence of the inductance and resistance of the coils) which convert then into two opposite sawtooth signals, as needed in the patent.
The electronic driving circuit for those signals could be quite simple: a 555 chip (or other) to create a low power pulsed signal (frequency regulator). This signal could go directly to a power transistor to drive one set of coils. This same pulsed signal from the 555 chip also should go to a logical “NOT” gate in order to invert it. This inverted signal should go to a second transistor to create the second square signal in opposition to the first one. See a schematic in this link.
In this Excel file you may find a simulation with different values of the inductance, resistance and the frequency.
Also, applying this same principle to two half AC waves (obtained from one AC signal with four diodes (see this schematic), one in each set of electromagnets oriented to take half wave in each set of electromagnets) the result is analogous, but here we are forced to use the frequency of the AC network (50 Hz or 60 Hz), while in the previous case with the pulsed signals we could adjust the frequency to get the proper response for our set of value for inductance (L) and resistance (R) and the filter that they create:
C) Using a center tapper transformer and a DC offset to get the two opposite signals
For example some examples are those creating a DC bias (diode bridge + capacitor) and then using an intermediate tap transformer. This circuit just creates two opposite signals with an intermediate tap transformer, and, then adds a DC offset created with a diode bridge and a capacitor. The intermediate tap transformer allows to take out two opposite signals, one in each of its sides, while feeding a DC offset through the intermediate tap. A simple sketch is here:
or even simpler, I have found that the rheostat is not need so you can reduce the heat losses of the original circuit. That rheostat was just creating a voltage drop that you can also manage with a different transformer in the DC offset. You just need to provide a transformer for the DC offset signal with a higher output voltage than the one with the intermediate tap, just taking into consideration that the DC offset voltage must be a little greater than that of the intermediate transformer. For example with 220V input a intermediate transformer (T1) with turn ratio 20:1 and a transformer for the DC bias (T2) with ratio 33:1 is apparently fine in simulation (supposing that in set of coils has 2.3 ohms and 23 mH, two sets used) :
even changing the intermediate tap transformer by two common transformers interconnected:
You may simulate this circuit online into the site of EasyEDA program just copying the text included in this file for intermediate tap transformer or this file for two transformers.You may test it online in the refered website. Open a New Schematic , Menu “Source EasyEDA” , Paste the code in the attached “doc” file, Pulse Apply.
D) Implement an electronic circuit with transistors to power sequentially each of the resistor described in the patent.
This subject is described in the Patrick Kelly Ebook – Free Energy Devices and Info (version December-2015). The aim is to crate a sequential firing method with transistor to introduce a power signal to the required resistor in each moment. For example the next image is a possible implementation for the driving circuit.
E) Simple circuit to create a DC offset to add to a AC signal
If we could create a DC offset , or bias , and then add a AC we could build the two required signals being always above zero and working in opposition. The DC offset is just to create a base magnetic field. In one electromagnet the DC offset will add up to the AC signal magnetic field, and in the other they will subtract. When the AC signal reverses its polarity the situation will be with the first subtracting and the second adding. This is: DC + AC in one , and DC – AC in other.
Even, I think that the DC offset may be substituted by a two permanent magnets. The magnet will create the same magnetic field that the DC signal was creating.
F) Implement a magnetic amplifier
In order to modulate the two power signals to the electromagnets with a small control signal driven by electronic circuit. Magnetic Amplifiers avoid using resistors and therefore you may skip wasting energy in those elements.
Idea: use a rectified AC signal as input to a magnetic amplifier in order to regulate the output signal with negative feedback, (negative gain) so that an increase in the input will make a decrease in the output (see below)
Some important ideas about mag amps:
“The magnetic amplifier, like the vacuum tube and the transistor, is an electrical control valve where a smaller current controls another circuit´s larger current”
“With a magnetic amplifier you can control AC load current only. For DC applications it is possible to control an AC current and rectify the output”
“Magnetic amplifier control circuits should accept AC input signals as well as DC input signals. The DC input signal is called “bias”. The most effective way to apply bias to a saturable core and also allow AC input signals to control the magnetic amplifier is to use a bias winding”
A kind of elementary design could be (note: you will need a higher frequency AC signal source because you will try to modulate it with a 50-60 Hz AC signal, therefore you will need a higher frequency in the source signal, maybe 400 Hz or higher, I do not know for sure):
The schematic is just to show the main idea. It is not a working design because I am not an expert (maybe someone more skillful into mag amps may design a working device…)
G) Building a variable relunctance toroid to split the current (like a variac but for DC signals)
Some users are postulating that a good way to avoid the power losses in the resistors a good option is to build a DC rheostat to alter the current into both sets of electromagnets by varying the reluctance in a toroidal coil.
Basically it is a big toroidal core with one winding with two extremes and, like in a variac, some intermediate taps which are fed backand forth in the way described in the patent with the commutator (or by an electronic switching circuit) , and, that toroidal coil is connected to each set of electromagnets by its extreme taps. I just include here this design in case of being useful because the aim of this webpage is to collect all possible methods to excite the system. But I am not in position to assure if this or other methods are right or wrong.
H) Using a push-pull amplifier
Some users of the forum suggests to user a push-pull amplifier for this task. I just post here this option but I have no idea of those devices, some kind of an audio amplifier or so.
The idea is create two low power opposite signals with a signal generator (there are some for PCs) and then take those signals and amplify them with the amplifier.
I) Forming each electromagnet with a group of coils connected in serie and powering them sequentially
Some users suggest that maybe Figuera was trying to transmist with his 7 sets of electromagnets that he could have used a single electromagnet with 7 coils connected in series. Then he could have been applying power to these coils sequentially in each electromagnet: in one electromagnet going from 7,6,5…1 coil powered (decreasing magnetic strength) while at the same time in the other electromagnet increasing magnetic strength by powering 1,2,3…7 coils. With this implementation you can get rid of the heat losses created by the resistors.